Payments built for the way
your business really runs.
25+ years of payment expertise applied to acquiring, local payment methods and human-reviewed risk decisions.
Licensed Austrian Payment Service Provider & Acquirer
A fragmented acquiring setup usually means separate contracts per scheme, separate liability lines and separate dispute paths to track. DaoPay acts as the licensed Austrian Payment Service Provider and acquirer, so the acquiring relationship, the liability line and the dispute path run through one licensed entity instead of several.
Does DaoPay hold the acquiring licence itself?
Yes. DaoPay acts as the licensed Austrian Payment Service Provider and acquirer, so the acquiring relationship, the liability line and the dispute path run through one licensed entity instead of several separate counterparts.
Which card schemes can be named directly?
Visa and Mastercard can be named directly. Other schemes are available upon request and are confirmed as part of the commercial setup rather than assumed by default.
How is payout timing agreed?
T+1 payout applies where the business case supports it. Timing is agreed once as part of the acquiring setup, instead of being negotiated separately per scheme contract.
100+ payment methods across 72+ countries.
One contract. One integration.
Visa, Mastercard, Bancontact, SEPA Direct Debit, PostFinance Pay, Volt Pay by Bank, PaysafeCard, iDEAL, Przelewy24, BLIK, DirectPay, eps, PayU, MyBank, Trustly, Paysera, Multibanco, DaoPay Phone Payments and many more are available through one contract and one integration. Availability is confirmed per business case, not universal by default.
Card schemes, local bank-transfer methods and prepaid/voucher methods relevant to cross-border and domestic retail checkout.
The exact method mix for an e-commerce setup is confirmed per business case and target market, not read off a fixed catalogue.
Card-on-file and SEPA Direct Debit form the core method mix for recurring billing. See Section 06 for the credential-handling detail.
Method availability for recurring flows follows the same per-business-case confirmation as one-off checkout.
Prepaid and voucher methods plus mobile payment routes (see Section 03) commonly fit digital-goods and digital-service purchase flows.
This is a starting reference point, not a fixed rule — the actual method mix depends on the specific product and market.
Mobile payments for markets where card acceptance is not the whole answer.
Voice Payment, Premium SMS (PSMS) and Direct Carrier Billing (DCB) let a customer pay through their mobile account instead of a card or bank transfer. This method set fits situations where the customer relationship is mobile-first and a card or bank login is friction, not a convenience.
Purchases billed through the customer's existing mobile account fit naturally where the mobile carrier relationship is already the primary billing channel.
Low-friction, small-value purchases benefit from a payment method that does not require entering card details for every transaction.
Mobile billing routes provide an alternative payment path for regulated digital channels where card-scheme rules or bank-transfer requirements apply additional constraints.
SEPA Direct Debit with mandate lifecycle built in.
Mandate issuance, return-code handling and scheme-timed pre-notification are built into the flow rather than left to manual tracking. Where mandate handling stays outside the integrated flow, reconciliation and audit preparation fall back onto manually cross-checked records, which is the concrete cost a fragmented setup adds later, not just an abstract risk.
The mandate lifecycle
- Mandate issuance: Captured and stored as part of the integrated flow
- Return-code handling: Processed within the same flow, not tracked separately
- Pre-notification: Timed per scheme requirement
- B2B perspective: Applies to B2B SEPA use as well as consumer use
Prepaid and voucher payments for the methods your customers know and use.
Paysafecard and other prepaid and voucher methods give customers a way to pay without a card or bank account, commonly relevant for digital goods and entertainment purchases where the customer prefers not to enter card details.
Available methods:
- Paysafecard
- Other selected prepaid and voucher-based methods
Configured only where they match:
- Merchant category
- Customer profile
- Market
Availability is use-case specific, evaluated against the merchant setup and confirmed during onboarding, not surfaced by default.
Worth raising early if you’re in digital goods, digital entertainment or content-driven services with established prepaid behaviour.
Relevant when: part of your customer base actively avoids card payments, or your market has established prepaid behaviour that card-only checkout would exclude.
Recurring and subscription payments with controlled credential handling.
Card-on-file and SEPA Direct Debit are handled as core building blocks under PCI-DSS standards, so stored-credential data stays inside a controlled scope rather than spreading across separate systems. Structured retry logic reduces the specific risk of failed renewals being retried in a way that damages the customer relationship or issuer standing, rather than being retried blindly.
Built for controlled recurring billing
- Card-on-file handling under PCI-DSS standards
- SEPA Direct Debit as a recurring-billing method
- Structured retry logic for failed renewals
Card data & scope
- Card data: managed to PCI-DSS standards, designed to keep it out of the merchant environment.
- Merchant scope: reduced, so there’s less for your team to manage directly.
Handled as part of the setup, not default checkout behaviour:
- Method rules
- Credential handling
- Retry logic
For complex subscription structures, multiple billing cycles or mixed recurring methods, the setup conversation should cover the full credential and method logic before integration begins.
What CFO and Compliance teams should notice: how credentials are handled at the payment layer affects what your team must certify and audit. A provider designed to keep card data out of your environment is worth evaluating carefully against your compliance workload.
Partner routes for ISO, PayFac, Referral and Reseller models.
Each partner route carries a different commercial structure and a different technical and onboarding path. The comparison below is a starting reference; the exact terms for any route are confirmed directly with DaoPay.
They differ across:
- Commercial structure
- Technical setup
- Merchant onboarding
- Regulatory considerations
- Commercial structure
- Independent Sales Organisation structure, commission-based.
- Technical setup
- No technical integration required from the partner.
- Onboarding
- Partner refers the merchant; DaoPay carries the merchant onboarding.
- Commercial structure
- Payment Facilitator structure, the partner carries a sub-merchant relationship.
- Technical setup
- Deeper technical integration into the partner's own platform.
- Onboarding
- Partner-managed sub-merchant onboarding, within DaoPay's licensed framework.
- Commercial structure
- Lightest commercial structure, referral-fee based.
- Technical setup
- No technical integration required.
- Onboarding
- Partner introduces the merchant; DaoPay carries the full onboarding and relationship.
- Commercial structure
- Reseller structure, the partner holds the commercial relationship with the end merchant.
- Technical setup
- Partner-branded technical setup, confirmed case by case.
- Onboarding
- Partner-led onboarding, aligned with DaoPay's licensed framework.
Approach
DaoPay shapes the contracting and operating structure around the model, starting from how you bring merchants: the referral or processing relationship, the merchant profile and the markets involved.
The Onboarding PreCheck applies to the cases a partner brings forward. Partners who pre-qualify enter with a clearer merchant case and less friction; broad, unqualified portfolios create more complexity for both sides. DaoPay supports partners building a structured, sustainable processing relationship, not just volume.
Anti-Algorithm risk defence — a human decides.
Automation handles volume. A human provides context where volume alone cannot make the right call. This is not a rejection of technology — automated checks still carry most of the workload — it is a defined point where a person, not a scoring model alone, decides.
DaoPay reviews applications with a human risk analyst, not only an automated score. The analyst weighs the full business case: model, market, category, transaction profile and regulatory context. It takes longer than a form submission, and produces a better-documented, accountable decision.
- 01Go
The case proceeds directly into the integration process (see the onboarding path).
- 02Review
A human reviewer examines the specific case context before a decision is made, rather than the case being auto-declined.
- 03No-Fit
The case does not proceed. This outcome is stated plainly, without implying the case was wrongly assessed or that a different provider would necessarily reach a different result.
Risk handling at transaction level
Risk signals, 3-D Secure strategy and human oversight work together so payment decisions stay accountable at every layer. When disputes reach the scheme, representation support is available within the agreed operating model.
How this connects to onboarding: the Onboarding PreCheck is the first stage: before you commit to integration, DaoPay assesses fit. The risk review is the natural continuation of that qualification, not a separate gate that appears later.
Know where you stand
before you commit.
Five questions. A clear next step.
Answer five short questions about your business and we come back to you with the right next step, before any paperwork begins.
Country in which your business is registered?
Your main company / headquarters: one country only.
Settlement, reconciliation and reporting — every fee line visible.
T+1 payout, where the business case supports it, is paired with transaction-level, scheme-fee-level and payout-level reconciliation, so each fee line stays traceable rather than folded into a single settlement figure.
Finance teams rarely get the full cost structure before the first settlement file arrives; blended rates obscure scheme fees, reconciliation files that don’t map to invoice lines create audit overhead, and settlement timing that’s never confirmed operationally creates cash-flow uncertainty at the worst moment.
DaoPay structures the settlement and reconciliation layer before go-live, not after.
Settlement
Timing and funding route are agreed upfront. Where the business case supports it, settlement runs T+1 with direct funding to your nominated account in covered acquiring categories.
Confirmed before go-live, so your finance team operates from a known structure:
- Timing
- Currency baseline
- Funding route
Reconciliation
Available at transaction, scheme-fee and payout level, through the merchant portal, scheduled export or API pull.
Every fee line visible
Shown separately per transaction, where the commercial setup supports it:
- Interchange++
- Scheme fee
- DaoPay margin
Line-by-line visibility for period close, audit preparation and operational cost review.
Blended pricing is available on request, for merchants whose volume and model support it.
What finance teams should ask before go-live: “Can you show me the settlement structure, timing and reconciliation format before we sign?” If a provider can’t answer clearly before onboarding, it won’t improve afterwards.
Fits businesses that want scheme fees, interchange and the DaoPay margin shown as separate, traceable lines, typically relevant once transaction volume makes fee-level visibility worth tracking closely.
Fits businesses that prioritise one predictable per-transaction rate over line-by-line fee visibility, typically relevant for simpler reconciliation needs.
Multi-currency handling
Additional currencies beyond the default set are confirmed upon request as part of the commercial setup, so currency needs can be planned into the contracting stage rather than discovered after go-live.










